Four ways to bring clinical judgement into digital delivery.
Each of these can stand alone or work together, depending on where a programme is and what's actually at risk.
DCB0129, DCB0160, hazard logs & safety cases
Hands-on clinical safety leadership for digital health projects — building and maintaining hazard logs, authoring safety cases, and running the DCB0129 (manufacturer) and DCB0160 (deploying organisation) process properly, not as a box-ticking afterthought.
- Clinical Safety Officer input and sign-off
- Hazard identification workshops with frontline staff
- Safety case documentation ready for scrutiny
Ambient voice, automation & decision support
Practical adoption strategy for AI in clinical settings — ambient voice technology, workflow automation, and decision support — built around what changes for the person actually using it, not just what the technology can theoretically do.
- Readiness assessment against real clinical workflows
- Risk-proportionate rollout planning
- Clinician engagement and change support
Making systems work the way clinicians do
EPR optimisation and alignment across Integrated Care Systems — bridging clinicians and technical teams so that configuration decisions reflect real clinical need, and programmes land cleanly instead of stalling at go-live.
- Workflow-led configuration review
- Cross-organisation alignment across an ICS footprint
- Post-go-live optimisation support
For boards, digital leaders & programme sponsors
Independent, senior clinical input at board and programme level — helping digital leaders and sponsors make decisions with a clear-eyed view of clinical risk, adoption reality, and where governance should support rather than slow things down.
- Board and steering group advisory
- Independent second opinion on digital strategy
- Programme sponsor support through delivery
The gap between strategy and the frontline is where digital programmes usually fail. That gap is the work.